|
The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
|
|
06-26-2012, 02:55 PM
 Post: #16 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
This car looks fantastic, and i would take it over any 3 series or C class in a heartbeat. The 3.6 will probably be one hell of a performer and I really can not wait to see an ATS-V. Well done Cadillac.
This country can’t be knocked out with one punch. We get right back up again and when we do the world is going to hear the roar of our engines. Yeah, it’s halftime America. And, our second half is about to begin. ![[Image: photobucket-4719-1330575709847.jpg]](http://i995.photobucket.com/albums/af78/ChallengerFan/photobucket-4719-1330575709847.jpg)
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 05:34 PM
Post: #17 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
Personally, I think its the best looking car in the segment, in front of the 3-Series. A lot of people don't like the new 3-Series but I think it looks good. The only weak part about the ATS is the side, it could use a stronger character line but its fine.
I love pussy, I love bitches, dude I should be runnin' PETA. I am a follower of the Kobe System. ![[Image: rotarykingsig.jpg]](http://i523.photobucket.com/albums/w351/mgl_995/rotarykingsig.jpg)
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 06:02 PM
Post: #18 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
The Camaro V6 will hit 60 in the fives so I'm guessing the ATS will do the deed in five flat or so. I'm a bit bummed out that the 3.6 doesn't offer the Camaro's manual but the sales volume probably wouldn't be there. Either way I'm betting this thing will be a barn-burner.
I'll be the first to admit that there are some things the F-Series does better than the Silverado. And by that I mean "donate it's back axle to the company's sporty car." |
|||
|
06-26-2012, 06:05 PM
Post: #19 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
That car looks fantastic in black
![[Image: Capture_Main.jpg]](http://i739.photobucket.com/albums/xx36/alux23/New%20Pics/Capture_Main.jpg) NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME, NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE ACTION, IN THE DEED THE GLORY
99 Grand Cherokee-04 Neon SXT
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 06:18 PM
Post: #20 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
I SAW ONE TODAY
![[Image: 2012-srt-viper-1.jpg]](http://i956.photobucket.com/albums/ae47/dougbshep/2012-srt-viper-1.jpg) 2000 Dodge Neon ES @dougieshep |
|||
|
06-26-2012, 06:33 PM
Post: #21 |
|||
|
|||
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
NOT THE GOAL BUT THE GAME, NOT THE VICTORY BUT THE ACTION, IN THE DEED THE GLORY
99 Grand Cherokee-04 Neon SXT
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 07:59 PM
Post: #22 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
Apparently the 2.0T manual weighs slightly more than the 2.0T automatic. First time I've read a manual weighing more than the automatic version of the same car.
I love pussy, I love bitches, dude I should be runnin' PETA. I am a follower of the Kobe System.
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 09:04 PM
Post: #23 |
|||
|
|||
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
 also i keep having to remind myself that this is a small car, for some reason i keep comparing it to the Charger's weight, thinking it's unbelievably light, even though it still technically is for it's class. 2000 Dodge Neon ES @dougieshep |
|||
|
06-26-2012, 09:06 PM
Post: #24 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
Wasn't the ATS supposed to be closer to 3200lbs?
I love pussy, I love bitches, dude I should be runnin' PETA. I am a follower of the Kobe System.
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 09:10 PM
Post: #25 |
|||
|
|||
|
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
It was supposed to be under 3,400 pounds, which it is.
|
|||
|
06-26-2012, 10:04 PM
Post: #26 |
|||
|
|||
RE: The 3,461-lb. rear-wheel-drive ATS achieves 0-60 mph acceleration in 5.4 seconds
jspookss;214441 Wrote:Yeah that 5.4 has to be conservative. The Camaro with the V6 manual that weighs about 3650 and some change did a 5.6 I've never seen a new Camaro's weight at 3,650, the V6 is even pushing 3,800 lbs. with this - as with all manufacturer claims... Very conservative! |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Chrysler is recalling certain model year 2008-2012 Wrangler right-hand drive vehicles | car fanatics | 0 | 114 |
05-11-2013 03:29 PM Last Post: car fanatics |
|
| GM North America president Mark Reuss wants a volume rear-wheel-drive Chevy | car fanatics | 9 | 315 |
05-06-2013 07:14 PM Last Post: The Voice of Doom |
|
| Toyota settles unintended acceleration case for $16 million | car fanatics | 26 | 537 |
04-10-2013 06:47 PM Last Post: All-Or-Nothing |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
