[car fanatics]

Cadillac
Photo credit: Cadillac
April 20, 2012
By: CF staff

‘Super cruise’ technology could be ready by mid-decade

Cadillac is road testing a semi-autonomous technology it calls “Super Cruise” that is capable of fully automatic steering, braking and lane-centering in highway driving under certain optimal conditions. The system could be ready for production vehicles by mid-decade.

Super Cruise is designed to ease the driver’s workload on the freeway, in both bumper-to-bumper traffic and on long road trips by relying on a fusion of radar, ultrasonic sensors, cameras and GPS map data.

“Super Cruise has the potential to improve driver performance and enjoyment,” said Don Butler, vice president of Cadillac marketing. “Our goal with advanced technologies, like this and our CUE system, is to lead in delivering an intuitive user experience.”

Many of the building block technologies for Super Cruise are already available on the all-new 2013 Cadillac XTS and ATS luxury sedans, as part of the available Driver Assist Package. It is the first Cadillac system to use sensor fusion to provide 360 degrees of crash risk detection and enhanced driver assist features, including:

• Rear Automatic Braking
  

• Full-Speed Range Adaptive Cruise Control
  

• Intelligent Brake Assist
  

• Forward Collision Alert
  

• Safety Alert Seat
  

• Automatic Collision Preparation
  

• Lane Departure Warning
  

• Side Blind Zone Alert
  

• Rear Cross Traffic Alert
  

• Adaptive Forward Lighting
  

• Rear Vision Camera With Dynamic Guidelines
  

• Head Up Display
  

The key to delivering semi-autonomous capability will be the integration of lane- centering technology that relies on forward-looking cameras to detect lane markings and GPS map data to detect curves and other road characteristics, said John Capp, General Motors director of Global Active Safety Electronics and Innovation.

Even when semi-autonomous driving capability is available on vehicles, the system will have operational limitations based on external factors such as weather and visibility of lane markings. When reliable data is unavailable, the driver will need to steer.

GM and its research partners recently conducted a study funded by the Federal Highway Administration on human factors in semi-autonomous vehicle operation. When asked, some study participants expressed strong interest in having a vehicle that could drive itself, particularly for long trips when lane centering and full-speed range adaptive cruise control could help lighten the driver’s workload.

“The primary goal of GM’s autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicle development is safety,” Capp said. “In the coming years, autonomous driving systems paired with advanced safety systems could help eliminate the crash altogether by interceding on behalf of drivers before they’re even aware of a hazardous situation. More than ever, consumers will be able to trust their car to do the right thing.”

[lengnert]

I applaud most all improvements in technology in vehicles.

I think this technology applied correctly (and judiciously) could be a tremendous achievement.

However, there are obvious drawbacks.

In the first major (or not, for that matter) accident where it is determined that the offending vehicle was using this technology, is GM going to held partly responsible in the damages?

That's just the first of many issues I can see being an impediment to the proliferation of semi-autonomous drive systems (whether it be from GM or anyone else).

[jspookss]

*dave chappelle rick james voice* We should have never gave cadillac money! Theyre building skynet cars!

[docCarter]

It's all Obama's fault.

[McLovin]

soooo, how soon before we see a super cruise cruze?

[The 'Burg]

Whenever I drove from SoCal to NorCal on Highway 5 (which is about 300 miles of boredom) I dreamed of having such technology. Same thing driving across Texas and Ohio...

At least in Cali I had the option of taking 101 up the coast rather than that boring-ass 5. It would add about 2 hours to my trip but it was soooo much more enjoyable (especially in my Bimmers and my Porsche).

5 was okay when I was driving my big Blazer.

[REVolution]

So much for cars being cars. Its inevitable but that doesn't mean I have to like it.