Since I started the "Star Ratings Threads" where we all get the chance to vote on selected cars, I thought it would be helpful to have a repository thread where we can put have one place to go to look at the results.
After each poll I intend on placing in here the final tally from each thread.
You won't have to go therefore go looking around for the answer to the burning question,"What is the Star Rating of the [Year Make and Model of favorite vehicle here]".
However, I invite all CF members that have posted similar threads to post there results here too (I believe so far that includes , Speed and GMopes).
My first poll was on the 2011 Cadillac CTC-V.
[
attachment=1064]
It received
8.03 Stars (out of 10).
The second poll I posted was on the 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302.
[
attachment=1065]
It received
8.31 Stars out of 10.
Awesome idea! We should choose someone to write a summary if possible. Unbiased, if possible about the car talking about pros and cons based off a summary of the reviews from other articles.
Over 45 years on this planet, and I have yet to meet anyone who is not biased on automobiles.
Whenever styling is involved, can't be done.
Although some are extremely objective, like myself.
For example, that Boss stang is the best looking car ever.
Again lengnert shows CarFanatics member's how it is done!
I tip my hat to you sir and what a great idea!!! Keep up the great work.:2thumbsup:
As for wings, I hear ya man, I am extremly objective and I think the Challenger is the most beautiful car for new cars. For vintage tin...'cuda baby!!!
Again lengnert shows CarFanatics member's how it is done!
I tip my hat to you sir and what a great idea!!! Keep up the great work.:2thumbsup:
As for wings, I hear ya man, I am extremly objective and I think the Challenger is the most beautiful car for new cars. For vintage tin...'cuda baby!!!
Now if lengnert can find a cure for this double-post-itus problem.
Now if lengnert can find a cure for this double-post-itus problem.
GotMopar?;134355 Wrote:Again lengnert shows CarFanatics member's how it is done! I tip my hat to you sir and what a great idea!!! Keep up the great work.:2thumbsup:
As for wings, I hear ya man, I am extremly objective and I think the Challenger is the most beautiful car for new cars. For vintage tin...'cuda baby!!!
Now if lengnert can find a cure for this double-post-itus problem.
Now if lengnert can find a cure for this double-post-itus problem.
Cheers!
And no, I have no cure for the post multiplicity.
I just hope by replying directly to your post, I don't catch it!
:ifyousayso:
I didn't see the Boss 302 thread, but I'd rate it a 9/10. I'd give it a perfect 10 if I could get it without the decals.
The 2011 Jaguar XF received
8.78 out of 10 stars (with a low vote count of 9 total votes).
[
attachment=1098]
Shocking.
Who would have thought that high HP or high cost luxury cars would get high marks.
What's next, low marks for value budget cars with minimal power?
What's the world coming to????
McLovin;138301 Wrote:Shocking.
Who would have thought that high HP or high cost luxury cars would get high marks.
What's next, low marks for value budget cars with minimal power?
What's the world coming to????
I honestly thought with the Caddy afficianado's on here, we might see a lower vote count for the XF than we saw for the CTC-V. Such was not the case.
The CTS-V may have been closer to the XF, but we will have to see.....
Does V stand for Vagina???
lengnert;138304 Wrote:McLovin;138301 Wrote:Shocking.
Who would have thought that high HP or high cost luxury cars would get high marks.
What's next, low marks for value budget cars with minimal power?
What's the world coming to????
I honestly thought with the Caddy afficianado's on here, we might see a lower vote count for the XF than we saw for the CTC-V. Such was not the case.
The CTS-V may have been closer to the XF, but we will have to see.....
I didn't vote...